Search for: "STARK et al v. YOUNG et al"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2017, 10:10 am
Stark in Margaret Kay Young, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:31 pm
Claire’s Stores, Inc., et al., CV09-09498 CBM (C.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm
By Nikki Vafai. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:00 am
He filed an amicus brief on behalf of America’s Health Insurance Plans, the national trade association representing health insurance providers, in support of California, et al., and the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:17 pm
Winborne, et al., C.A. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Singh et al 2006 BCSC 1545 involves such a case. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
